That thread - Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10?
pemboa at gmail.com
Mon Jul 7 03:09:57 UTC 2008
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:01 PM, pds <pds100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:52:22 -0400
> max <maximilianbianco at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > mike cloaked wrote:
>> >> Most of the complainers do not directly fix things - so we all
>> >> perhaps need a little patience and do our bit to help rather than
>> >> simply grumble.
>> > Be careful, I'd really like to avoid giving an impression that any
>> > stuff like this is unwanted or falls on deaf ears.
>> > Just keep in mind that constructive feedback, even in the form of
>> > complaining, is invaluable. The "constructive" part being very
>> > important.
>> > -- Rex
>> Its hard to listen to a bunch of complaining when there isn't
>> anything constructive included. I want KDE 3.5 back is not what i
>> would consider constructive.
> When features are in KDE3.5 work better than the newer version, I'll ask
> for the older version back anytime. You want specific examples:
> 1) The background on the virtual screen do not spread across all
> physical screens. (Yes a bug was submitted.)
> 2) Not able to hide the panel, at least I haven't found a method.
> There is more, but this is enough to make another choice. KDE
> 4.0 is not an improvement, when functionality is lost from the previous
> revision and its not documented. (If I did miss it, please provide a
> pointer to it.)
> I also think a complete previous revision should be supplied until the
> next revision is functionally equivalent. This will give USER the
> choice of which version to use without being forced to use a choice
> that he doesn't prefer. Since the choice of KDE 3.5 is not completely
> available, I'm being forced into is switching to gnome and using kpager
> from the kde trunk sources.
Okay, the magic Fedora KDE slave elves will get on that for you right
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the fedora-list