Where is 2.6.32?

[Bill Davidsen]

Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance
>> regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some
>> developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc.
> 
> I thought it's only tainted if there are non-GPL modules compiled in.
> For instance, I saw the tainted message whenever I insmod'ed fglrx driver
> 
You're right, I am assuming he was talking about the nvidia modules which are 
not GPL, when he mentioned 2.6.32.2+Nvidia. So it would only me tainted if he 
wanted to have graphics. Or the licensing may have changed, things are not the 
same for long.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot