[Fedora-livecd-list] PowerPC support.
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Mon Apr 30 19:27:36 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:33 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 14:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > At http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/dwmw2/livecd-ppc.git
> > (git://git.infradead.org/~dwmw2/livecd-ppc.git) there's a set of patches
> > which first introduces a little abstraction for the arch-specific
> > configureBootloader() and createIso() functions, then implements the PPC
> > version.
> Cool -- there's definitely some abstraction needed, the question is more
> of where to put them. I think what might make sense is to get a few
> little things in the tree (like J5's fixes so that things work with FC6)
> and then branch off what we'll use for F7 and then continue to use HEAD
> so we can start doing more things like some of the refactoring from
> markmc as well as getting the architecture bits cleanly separated out.
> I'll try to get to making progress on that this afternoon.
OK, thanks. There are a few details to be tidied up in the ppc
bootloader support but it's basically there. The main thing missing is
the 64-bit kernel.
> > 1. Allow mayflower path to be specified, to run from git tree
> I wonder if instead of specifying a path, it makes more sense to just
> notice that you're running from the git tree and use the mayflower
> script from there. The only problem is that sort of opens up to a
> certain class of attack. I'm not sure how important it really is to
> care about it, though.
Yeah, I thought about that but I lack the wit for it -- what you see in
the git tree is the most python I've ever done :)
> > 2, Remove syslinux from package lists; add it dynamically instead.
> The only problem with this is that it somewhat breaks the abstraction --
> maybe some distro using livecd-tools needs the isolinux package for
> those bits. Does an error get raised with non-existent packages right
Yes. Although there is perhaps some logic in using --skip-broken.
More information about the Fedora-livecd-list