rawhide/fc4 extras builds

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Sat Feb 26 17:39:23 UTC 2005


>>At fedora.us we've had mass-rebuilds for the first or second test release,
>>and the dist tag made a release bump unnecessary.
>
>Right but if you read the packaging guidelines, I'm not sure we're
>quite there yet for those bits of infrastructure.
>
>
>>In Fedora Extras, this is the first time we branch in CVS, and we need a
>>concept.
>
>The concept is simple - give a place to start from and to start merging
>to. When fc-4 gets finally branched in core cvs then we should branch
>fc-4 in extras as well and 'devel' becomes the new location for:
>  1. the fedora extras development repository
>  2. the new work for fc5
>
>Then the FC-4 branch in extras becomes where you merge changes for FC-4
>extras packages to.
>FC-3 for FC-3 extras package changes.
>etc
>etc
>etc.
>
>thats the the structure that I think was intended. So extras matches
>how core is developed.
>
>does that make sense to you?
>-sv

Sorry for that being html-mail - the workaround to a composer bug in evo
is to write in html-mode then swap it back to text-mode when you finish.
I forgot to do that.

-sv





More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list