Fedora Core package cleanup project

Michael J. Knox michael at knox.net.nz
Wed May 17 03:03:24 UTC 2006

Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:52:20AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>>Here's the list of SRPMs that failed to generate binary RPMs on
>>x86_64 against rawhide (258 packages).  The full package build
>>results, logs, rpmlints and rpmdiffs are posted here:
>>  http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
> Just a little re-arranging, sticking the overall log files at the top
> of the directory listing.  Once a package is gone from rawhide, it'll
> be gone from the directory here too, so that should just keep around
> the current version of packages.
> I'm excluding tclx from the build list, as 'make test' never completes
> inside the chroot.  So it fails to build, but also stalls the
> builder. :-( Once that's fixed I'll add it back in.
> The current state of affairs:
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
> Packages that failed to build:
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/00-failed-to-build.txt
> (presently 249 packages, progress made already!)
> Packages that add or remove files/provides/requires as compared to rawhide:
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/00-rpmdiff-added-or-removed.txt
> Within each package, there are the build logs, rpmdiff.log, and
> rpmlint.log for easy review.
> This *should* run daily around 10am CDT (UCT-5), and results will land
> on the site as soon as the builds are all done (usually just a few hours).

Nice work Matt..

I am wondering if a temp wiki page should be created to list the 
currently failed builds with BZ# so people can see from a quick look at 
which packages are good or bad.


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list