Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:54:55AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> >You started a completely unmotivated raging crusade against my
> >packaging work, and now try to hide behind "constructivism"?
> >
> >This thread is about your bad behaviour/fudding, not any existing or
> >non-existing technical issues. Don't try to divert from that, please.
> 
> My FUDing is *nothing* compared to the damage your repository has done
> by forking Fedora and essentially creating your own distribution.  If
> this thread is about FUDing, it should have ended LONG ago.

This thread *is* about fudding, check the subject.

> We are *trying* to get this thread off the FUD issue and onto more
> important issues which have to deal with potential bugs in packages.
> But you seem to think FUDing is a far more important issue to discuss.

"Off the FUD issue": Are you admitting to have been fudding? Let's get
the FUD issue resolved and we'll worry about *true* technical issues
in another thread.

What I'd like to see is

o general consensus about disapprovement of the FUD in the bugzilla
  (I think this has almost already happened)

o A netiquette and deescalation mechanism like some quoted to put in
  place for future similar situations

It just can't be accepted that people with a fedora account represent
the project in such an inappropriate way!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/cb853f2a/attachment.sig>