Feedback on Fedora Core 4 test 2 review

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:49 -0400, Erik Hemdal wrote:

> I don't think Red Hat ever hid the Fedora Project.  I got the EOL email 
> and it pointed me to the Red Hat site with the big RHEL vs. Fedora 
> links.  The choices were pretty obvious to me.  

IIRC, this was a total SNAFU.  Meaning, it was an oversight not to
better highlight Fedora in the EOL email, people were -very- vocal about
that from the outside, and that vocalization carried internally.
Subsequent emails did a better job of highlighting Fedora.

When you have a choice between "It's a Conspiracy!" and "it's just
stupid humans doing stupid human stuff," most likely it's the latter.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20050429/3459dbcc/attachment.sig>