Fedora derivatives branding discussion
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Thu Apr 20 20:21:56 UTC 2006
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but
> adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in
> Extras (;
What? That makes no logical sense. You're saying that something takes a
_base_ of Fedora and builds on that base by adding additional packages is
some way not _based_ on Fedora?
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list