Fedora derivatives branding discussion

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 16:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > That is no longer based on Fedora.  That includes parts of Fedora, but
> > adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora.  Get the package in
> > Extras (;
> 
> What? That makes no logical sense. You're saying that something takes a
> _base_ of Fedora and builds on that base by adding additional packages is
> some way not _based_ on Fedora? 

I used the wrong term.  If we're going to allow the logo to be used on
anything that is 'BUILT' from Fedora binary packages (Core+Extras), then
as soon as you add anything to that outside of existing Core+Extras
packages then it can't use the logo.  That's what I was trying to drive.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20060420/6bc58125/attachment.sig>