[Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 19 17:27:24 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ardour
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315
------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Briefly check of spec file gives following remarks:
> - why do you not use %find_lang macro?
How do I use this? There are .mo files with different names (gtk_ardour.mo,
libardour.mo, etc).
> - ardor needs own the /etc/ardour/ (and may be use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /
> etc)
Done.
> - differnet style of build root definition (%buildroot vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and
> %{buildroot}%{_other_macro} vs. %{buildroot}/%{_other_macro})
Fixed.
> - buildrequires overhead (gcc-c++, flex and so on. See packaging guidelines)
Removed gcc-c++. I believe flex is required.
> - more preferable to put full URL instead of name-version in Source: parameter
Fixed.
> - I don't know about noreplace feature in %config. Possible you need it.
Added.
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list