[Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 15 09:31:31 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448
alexl at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
Flag|needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) |
------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-15 05:21 EST -------
I updated the spec and the srpms with new versions.
ldconfig is added.
We do use gacutils to install the dlls, but not in the strange way that the
packaging guidelines example show, its just called as a normal part of the
upstream makefiles. We do pass the GACUTIL_FLAGS to make to override some of the
flags passed to it though.
I also added the -devel packages, but I don't think this is a very good idea.
The packaging guidelines says its bad because it'll somehow pull in devel
packages in a non-devel install, but that is simply not true (it has no
dependencies). Instead we duplicate all the package metadata for a 900 byte
package, bloating the install. Furthemore, having a -devel package means the
distro compose will pull in the 32bit version of the packages into the 64bit
distro, reinstating the yum update multilib conflict we solved this week.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list