[Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 15 14:44:53 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448





------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com  2006-08-15 10:35 EST -------
Alex, if the guidelines don't make sense, PLEASE PLEASE help us to make them
better.  Mono is one of those things that leave most of us scratching our heads
and trying to make sense of it.

The -devel package is to prevent development files being packaged in the main
package.  We've gone over this before, users may want to develop 32bit mono
software on a x86_64 host.  If mono isn't arch specific, then why aren't the
packages noarch?  I don't believe we "solved" anything last week, the headers
from the 32bit package and the 64bit package shouldn't conflict.  If they do,
the package needs to be fixed, not just avoided to sweep the problem under the rug.

if you wish to discuss the guidelines, please send mail to
fedora-packaging-list at redhat.com 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list