[Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 25 05:00:29 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-25 00:50 EST -------
I had to chase dependencies a bit to make sure that %libdir/gjc is properly
owned, but I'm pretty sure it is. I wish there was a handy recursive dependency
chaser.
* source files match upstream.
(No checksums possible; see above. Comparison using diff shows the source to
be identical.)
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate (as far as I can tell for Java)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* debuginfo package looks complete (no source, but there are debug symbols).
* rpmlint complaints are acceptable.
* final provides and requires are sane:
eclipse-subclipse-1.1.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.ui_1.1.5.jar.so()(64bit)
subclipse-core.jar.so()(64bit)
svnClientAdapter.jar.so()(64bit)
eclipse-subclipse = 1.1.5-1.fc6
=
/usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db
eclipse-platform
ganymed-ssh2 >= 209
java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33
javasvn >= 1.1.0
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
subversion-javahl >= 1.3.1
eclipse-subclipse-book-1.1.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
eclipse-subclipse-book = 1.1.5-1.fc6
=
eclipse-subclipse = 1.1.5-1.fc6
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets present (rebuild-gcj-db) are OK.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. The subversion
book is provided as an eclipse plugin in a separate package.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list