[Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 3 19:49:08 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library
Alias: alfont

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-12-03 14:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> ==== MUST FIX ====
> - Investigate rpmlint warnings
This is because I forgot to link the library with allegro, fixed. Now it gives:
[hans at shalem alfont]$ rpmlint alfont
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_r
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_w
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_get_cpuid_info
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_486
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6
_i_is_cpuid_supported
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cyrix
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_fpu

This is normal, as allegro consists of a dynamiclinked .so and a statically
linked .a filoe which contains some non PIC and thus non sharable asm functions.

Also see the "allegro-config --libs" output.

> - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package?
patch backup file installed by bad wildcard install, wildcard fixed.

Here is a new version with these both fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont-2.0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list