[Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel
Alias: svrcore-devel

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393


toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |toshio at tiki-lounge.com




------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com  2006-12-08 00:41 EST -------
I'm looking into autotooling this.  It's not impossible but I'm going to have to
look into the coreconf stuff more closely to make sure I'm not missing something
in my initial pass.  Some questions:

* Why is this package called srvcore-devel?  The library looks like it's called
libsrvcore so the -devel extension looks extraneous. (This will also cause you
packaging headaches as there's usually a main package with the shared libs and a
subpackage named %{name}-devel for static libraries and headers.  If you did
that in this case you'd have svrcore-devel-devel.  So you can either rename at
the upstream level or the packaging level.)

* Is it okay if I change the directory structure or are you still committed to
building this in a mozilla tree where the directory structure is important?

* Does anyone understand coreconf and want to walk me through it on IRC -- if
not, I'll figure it out on my own.  It's just a question of speed and assurance
that I'm not taking a false start.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.