[Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 21 06:30:41 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764
------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 02:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> rpmlint has this to say:
>
> W: hfsplus-tools no-documentation
> It looks like there are manpages in the tarball; any reason not to package them?
None whatsoever :) Corrected. I made only minimal changes to them, as
evidenced in the new spec -- basically just changing the name of the util in the
page so people wouldn't get wicked confused.
> These are from executable source files. Easily fixed with a quick chmod.
> E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
> /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/hfs_endian.h
[...]
Fixed.
> While it's true that the source is all under the APSL and that this package
> doesn't actually include a copy, the APSL is sufficiently both different and
> uncommon that I do think it would be a good idea to include it in the package.
> I couldn't find it directly in text form, but you can snip it from
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/.
Done.
> It doesn't look as if the compiler is being called with the proper flags. The
> gentoo patch sets up its own set of CFLAGS which are not the ones used in
> Fedora. I wonder if it works to delete CFLAGS from the Makefiles and then pass
> them on the commandline.
Gentoo specific bits now nixed; retained the flags that look like they're more
specific to the code at hand.
Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools-332.11-1.fc5.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list