[Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 21 06:30:41 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764





------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu  2006-07-21 02:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> rpmlint has this to say:
> 
> W: hfsplus-tools no-documentation
> It looks like there are manpages in the tarball; any reason not to package them?

None whatsoever :)  Corrected.  I made only minimal changes to them, as
evidenced in the new spec -- basically just changing the name of the util in the
page so people wouldn't get wicked confused.

> These are from executable source files.  Easily fixed with a quick chmod.
> E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
> /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/hfs_endian.h
[...]

Fixed.

> While it's true that the source is all under the APSL and that this package
> doesn't actually include a copy, the APSL is sufficiently both different and
> uncommon that I do think it would be a good idea to include it in the package. 
> I couldn't find it directly in text form, but you can snip it from
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/.

Done.

> It doesn't look as if the compiler is being called with the proper flags.  The
> gentoo patch sets up its own set of CFLAGS which are not the ones used in
> Fedora.  I wonder if it works to delete CFLAGS from the Makefiles and then pass
> them on the commandline.

Gentoo specific bits now nixed; retained the flags that look like they're more
specific to the code at hand.

Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools-332.11-1.fc5.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list