[Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 25 09:47:46 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064


paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2006-07-25 05:38 EST -------
Okay, let's look at the spec

%define name_version %{name}-%{version}

This isn't needed. Just wipe it

BR gcc isn't needed

Not sure on the obsoletes/provides.

%configure --prefix - %configure is enough (unless the tarball decides to put it
somewhere odd). If it is available as a configure option, include --disable-static

%install

the two strip lines aren't required. 

%package devel

Requires : should be %{version}-%{release}. It helps keep the devel files in
pace with the main package.

%description devel

The second paragraph isn't needed

%files

%{_bindir}/* - how many binaries does the package make? If they all start with
PT, then %{_bindir}/PT* and then one for the other one is a much better idea.
The same applies with the %{_libdir}

Does libpano12 not create it's own directory in %{_includedir} or is it again
just a couple of files?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list