[Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 25 10:28:02 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064





------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net  2006-07-25 06:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)

I've updated the files:

Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec
SRPM URL:
http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-3.src.rpm

> %define name_version %{name}-%{version}
> 
> This isn't needed. Just wipe it
> BR gcc isn't needed

Ok gone.

> Not sure on the obsoletes/provides.

This was for users migrating from rh9 to fc1, I guess it isn't needed
any more ;-)

> %configure --prefix - %configure is enough (unless the tarball decides to put it
> somewhere odd). If it is available as a configure option, include --disable-static

Ok done.  --disable-static is an option, but I still have to rm the .la file

> the two strip lines aren't required. 

Ok done.

> %package devel
> 
> Requires : should be %{version}-%{release}. It helps keep the devel files in
> pace with the main package.
> 
> %description devel
> 
> The second paragraph isn't needed

Fixed.

> %files
> 
> %{_bindir}/* - how many binaries does the package make? If they all start with
> PT, then %{_bindir}/PT* and then one for the other one is a much better idea.
> The same applies with the %{_libdir}

Ok I've changed them to be more specific.

> Does libpano12 not create it's own directory in %{_includedir} or is it again
> just a couple of files?

Yes it creates %{_includedir}/pano12.  Fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list