[Bug 196057] Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196057


nacc at us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |nacc at us.ibm.com
               Flag|needinfo?                   |




------- Additional Comments From nacc at us.ibm.com  2006-06-23 13:24 EST -------
RE: hugetlbd always being 32-bit. Yes, that is intentional. The original reason
was to avoid having to always ask bug submitters which version of the daemon
were you running. But, given that a 64-bit user could install both the 64-bit
and 32-bit libhugetlbfs packages, this also happens to avoid deciding which
hugetlbd should exist, right (as both obj32/hugetlbd and obj64/hugetlbd would be
installed into the same location)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.