[Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-05-06 14:30 EST -------
Oops hit save too soon (before typing the comment I wanted to type)

I was away this afternoon (outside, fresh air and sun you know) and while
cycling to the city I was wondering about the arch problem. And I came up with a
nice and clean solution which imho is much better then in the current spec file:

Why not make ctapi lib packages require %{_libdir}/ctapi instead of ctapi-cmmon,
then on dual arch systems like x86_64 they will automaticly drag in the right
one. Since both an i386 and an x86_64 version of ctapi-common could get
installed we do still need the arch in the filename under /etc/ld.so.conf.d

Also in this case I think it would be better to put the README in a seperate
file and "install -p" it so that both arch packages have the same timestamp for it.

What do you think if you agree please attach a new version and I'll review it.
If you don't agree any better suggestions? I find your current solution not so
elegant.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.