[Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2006-05-06 15:00 EST -------
The dir based dependency is doable, but it'll break as soon as some other
package owns %{_libdir}/ctapi.  We can make sure it doesn't happen within FE,
but I can imagine a 3rd party package doing that eg. for cross distro
compatibility issues.  I find the provided thingy less likely to break, but I
don't have too strong opinion on this.

Regarding README, I have both i386 and x86_64 ctapi-common with differing README
timestamp installed here, and rpm doesn't raise a conflict and even rpm -V is
silent for both.  Simply having it as SourceX isn't enough to guarantee the same
timestamp in packages due to eg. cvs checkouts, it would have to be put into a
tarball or touch'd with a timestamp to ensure that.  I'm not sure if it's worth
the trouble, especially considering that rpm doesn't seem to have any issues
with the current implementation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.