[Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 8 14:39:15 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ganymed


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014





------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com  2006-05-08 10:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)

> * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top
> instead of just...
> %define gcj_support     1
> ?

umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just
to make easy to package it for RHEL

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-April/msg00048.html

> 
> * I've been using %{?dist} in Release tags, like
> Release:    1%{?dist}
> 
> * There's a preference to not use macros in Source0.  It's something somebody
> should be able to wget directly.

umm then i need to update my other packages already on extras, 

> 
> * Missing '.' at the end of %description.
> 
> * Single line %post[un] bits should look like this...
> %post -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db
> %postun -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db
> (rpmlint will complain about this)
> 
> Thanks!
> 

The other ones are easy to do :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list