[Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 17 02:14:07 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-05-16 22:13 EST -------
* rpmlint gives those warnings:

W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashasobjs.so
W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbackend.so
W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashgeo.so
W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashserver.so
W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbase.so

Maybe it isn't necessary to have a distinct gnash-devel package, 
but in that case it may be good to 
Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}

There is also this warning that may be problematic, although I don't
know how to solve it:
E: klash binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/kde3/libklashpart.so
['/usr/lib', '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib']

Other rpmlint warnings/errors are not problematic.

* Maybe the gnash package should be in 
Group:          Applications/Multimedia
and not in Applications/Internet (the plugins are rightly in Applications/Internet).

* also you could have a look at the descriptions and summary in the 
spec file in the tarball and pick ideas, although it is up to you,
the one you proposed are good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list