[Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 17 13:46:54 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049
------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-17 09:46 EST -------
Thanks for the speedy review. :)
Sorry I missed the upstream update again....
(In reply to comment #1)
> * klash is now gnash-klash for the subpackages upstream, this name should
> be used here also for consistency with what will appear.
Ok.
> * there is a security issue that should be patched in fedora extras package,
> indeed there is an insecure use of /tmp. If it is too much work, at least
> there should be a note somewhere.
Is there a patch from cvs that can be backported for this?
> * the documentation should be distributed (see the specfile in the tarball
> for hints on how to do this), except if there is a good reason not to
> distribute it? At least manpage and html manual, info files and
> scrollkeeper files would be bonus
Sounds good. I added buildrequires docbook2X for that.
(In reply to comment #2)
> W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashasobjs.so
> W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbackend.so
> W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashgeo.so
> W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashserver.so
> W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbase.so
I removed them for now.
> There is also this warning that may be problematic, although I don't
> know how to solve it:
> E: klash binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/kde3/libklashpart.so
> ['/usr/lib', '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib']
I added --disable-rpath to configure.
> * Maybe the gnash package should be in
> Group: Applications/Multimedia
> and not in Applications/Internet (the plugins are rightly in
Applications/Internet).
Thanks, fixed.
I also subpackaged the libraries.
http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-2.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list