[Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ibmasm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059





------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com  2006-09-05 14:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Builds cleanly, rpmlint complains on the -devel package

Oh, I completly forgot to run rpmlint on the -devel package. Thank you for
spotting that.

> 
> W: summary-ended-with-dot
> E: summary-too-long
> W: no-docs (not worried by)
> E: script-without-shellbank %{_includedir}/ibmasm/rsa.h and libibmasm.h
> 
> The errors need fixing (the last one is probably just a case of setting the
> permission to 644 for each file)

Done.
> 
> Not building in mock
> 
> Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper chroot
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root /sbin/runuser - root -c
> "/sbin/runuser -c 'rpmbuild -ba --target i386 --nodeps
> /builddir/build/SPECS/ibmasm.spec' mockbuild"
> error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/ibmasm_user_3.0-9.fc6.tar.bz2: No such file
> or directory
> 
> (this could well be my system, but it's working on other packages correctly)

This is due to:
Release: 9%{?dist}
and 
Source0: ibmasm_user_%{version}-%{release}.tar.bz

Should I just remove the %{?dist} out? I decided to do that for the .10 release.
It can always be changed back, or there can be two types of Release: tags?


Here is the 3.0-10 release with fixes.

SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec
SRPMS URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-10.src.rpm




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.