[Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 28 19:00:56 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 15:00 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Bad:
>
> - Don't sourced QT environment variables.
> (this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version)
This isn't needed.
> - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm:
> E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
> and dsPIC microcontrollers
I don't have this error!
Mamoru, please, could you confirm?
> W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
> ../doc/common
> /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
> warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
> within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
Why do you want I make a better package than you?
rpmlint kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm
W: kyum
dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
W: kyum
symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
E: kyum non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/kyum/kyum_sysinfo.py 0644
E: kyum zero-length /usr/share/doc/kyum-0.7.5/README
/tmp/kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm.3618/usr/share/applications/kde/fedora-kyum.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list