[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317





------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com  2007-04-29 11:18 EST -------
I still stand on my earlier comments: you've not understood what is mindi's
goal, not why I need to control the way busybox is built.
I don't use whatever busybox, I make a special binary based on busybox hold
under rootfs/sbin that will be use at restore time. You asked to not have a
binary in the tree, and I agreed on that, even if it wasn't a priority for the
project. Now let me use what I need, no what you would like us to do !! We're
not here to discuss on upstream functions but to package an existing app !

Now, I think I won't pass any more time on this. 
After all people wanting to use it on fedore have packages since a long time,
and use them. My goal was to make it easy for fedore users. You disagree. That's
fine. I'll rather work on creating repodata info and config files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.