[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 29 21:41:42 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-29 17:41 EST -------
I'm sorry you feel that way. To give you some perspective of where i'm coming
from. say i start some project and fork busybox for my needs and so does
someone else. with your version we would now have 4 slightly different
versions of busybox. that means 4 seperate people need to maintain it.
The reason i suggest and its not a must just a suggestion that you use the
fedora busybox. is so that we don't end up with a ton of pretty much the same
but just a litte different versions of the same package. You need to submit
your mindi-busybox package for review.
Please continue to work with us.
I did a quick check of the package last night. you are still not using
disttags as per the guidelines. you are not allowed to hardcode the disttag
value. /etc/mindi/ needs to be owned by mindi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list