[Bug 226998] Review Request: gemdropx - Falling blocks puzzlegame
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 9 09:04:09 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gemdropx - Falling blocks puzzlegame
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226998
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-02-09 04:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well,
>
> * BuildRequires
> - Mockbuild fails on FC7 i386 (needs desktop-file-utils)
>
Oops, can't believe I forgot that, fixed.
> * Documentation
> - Please add other "README" files
>
I assume you mean INSTALL.txt ICON.txt and TODO.txt?
INSTALL.txt and ICON.txt both contain installation instructions and thus should
not be packaged. I've added TODO.txt
> * Timestamps
> - keep timestamps on image files and etc, i.e. use "cp -p"
> or "install -p"
>
Fixed
> * Desktop file entry
> -----------------------------------------------------
> --add-category X-Fedora \
> -----------------------------------------------------
> is deprecated and should be removed.
>
> * Scriptlets
> -----------------------------------------------------
> if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
> -----------------------------------------------------
> is redundant because execution of non-existing file
> simply exits with 127 and is ignored by || :
I've been doing things like this for over a year now, I know there was some
discussion about both of these but I never followed it close enough to learn the
new guidelines, to busy with other Fedora stuff. I've read the new guidelines
now, thanks for straightening me out on this -> Both fixed.
Here is a new version with all this fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gemdropx.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gemdropx-0.9-2.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list