[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: texi2html


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-02-14 15:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Could you please add a comment explaining how you generated the
> > cvs snapshot such that sources may be checked.
> 
> After checking it out from cvs I did:
> autoreconf
> ./configure
> make dist
> 
> what generated the source tarball for me.

I tried but it didn't worked. There were permissions issues for the
just updated files. Since the autotools generated files are already 
there, why not repackage the fresh cvs checkout? It is easier
to verify the sources then. 
Here is something that could work and be reproducible:

cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.savannah.nongnu.org:/sources/texi2html co -D
20070214 -d texi2html-1.77-20070214cvs texi2html
cd texi2html-1.77-20070214cvs
chmod a+x autogen.sh config.guess config.sub configure install-sh mdate-sh
missing mkinstalldirs buildt2h.sh doc/mdate-sh
cd ..
tar cjvf texi2html-1.77-20070214cvs.tar.bz2 texi2html-1.77-20070214cvs

> I'm going to add the latex2html Requires. I'm not quite sure we want to add
> tex4ht dependency as it's not in Core and used only in examples?

It is not really an example, it is an init file. With
  texi2html --init-file tex4ht.init
httex is used to render @tex and @math similarly than -l2h uses 
latex2html. Of course the dependency could only be added after the merge.
It adds functionality, however, it also brings in the whole TeX
stuff, so adding it as a Requires or not is not obvious.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.