[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: texi2html


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-02-14 15:56 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)

> Nope, only these perl requires are autodetected:
> perl(Cwd)
> perl(Exporter)
> perl(File::Spec)
> perl(Getopt::Long)
> perl(POSIX)
> perl(strict)
> perl(vars)

Ok, so Text::Unidecode should be added, but after the merge, 
since it is in extras. It is not surprising that it isn't
detected, since weird things are done to ensure that it
is detected at runtime.

> > texi2html could own  $sysconfdir/texinfo/ and $datadir/texinfo/
> > together with texinfo, since users may want to put an htmlxref.cnf
> > in those directories, which could be used by texi2html, and
> > makeinfo (once it is implemented in makeinfo).
> 
> Hmmm, won't this clash with texinfo? %{_datadir}/texinfo is owned by texinfo
> itself already.

Both texi2html and makeinfo are able to take advantage of what is
in %{_datadir}/texinfo and %_sysconfdir/texinfo/ (more precisely of 
an htmlxref.cnf file) since we agreed on the location and format 
of htmlxref.cnf. Similarly both should put the html manuals in
%{_datadir}/texinfo/html. Otherwise said %{_datadir}/texinfo/ is not 
specific of an implementation of a texinfo to html converter, but
of the texinfo language.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.