[Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 18 03:01:38 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-17 22:01 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)

1. ok.
2. ok.
3. ok.
4. ok. Yeah, libgsf-gnome-devel was split off recently in devel.
5. ok.
6. ok.
7. ok. All makes sense.
8. ok.
9.
>> 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release.
>> Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package?
>> That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated.
>
>Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash-
docs.

Well, for instance if you have Requires: gnucash-docs = 2.0.1 now, you
can upgrade the main package without needing docs updates until the next
time they update the docs. I don't know how often upstream updates the
main package without the docs also being updated however, so this might
not be worth the trouble.

A few additional items:

- There is a 'Requires: qbanking'. Nothing currently provides that...
Should that be 'aqbanking'? Any particular version?

- Oddly the changes you made in the rpath disabling seem to have fixed
whatever I was seeing with the smp_mflags not working. This cuts buildtime
here from about 70min to about 23min. Can you confirm adding smp_mflags
works now?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list