[Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388





------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com  2007-01-18 12:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> >> 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release.
> >> Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package?
> >> That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated.
> >
> >Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash-
> docs.
> 
> Well, for instance if you have Requires: gnucash-docs = 2.0.1 now, you
> can upgrade the main package without needing docs updates until the next
> time they update the docs. I don't know how often upstream updates the
> main package without the docs also being updated however, so this might
> not be worth the trouble.

Hm, possibly. Let me see how much pain it is to split, shouldn't be
too much.

> A few additional items:
> 
> - There is a 'Requires: qbanking'. Nothing currently provides that...
> Should that be 'aqbanking'? Any particular version?

See currently-under-review aqbanking package - it's split off.

> - Oddly the changes you made in the rpath disabling seem to have fixed
> whatever I was seeing with the smp_mflags not working. This cuts buildtime
> here from about 70min to about 23min. Can you confirm adding smp_mflags
> works now?

I'll need to test - I've still seen errors where the guile bindings/C libraries
get out of sync and fail.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.