[Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 19 01:23:04 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-18 20:23 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> * CXXFLAGS:

Right

> * "What about asking upstream for a possibility to have something like 
> menuprog, but which is called only when starting icewm?"
> 
> I think I have a better solution (at least short-term one): By default
> icewm-session tries to execute the "startup" script (if it exists) within the
> user's .icewm directory.
> While not perfect, I should be able to create a default script that will use the
> icewm-xdg-menu.py to generate static menu items.
> However, such a solution may require recursive bash scripting and I rather take
> the time to think about it.
> (Plus, an ideal script should also generate the icon-line for each and every
> menu item).

Also it implies messing with users config file which is not very clean.

> * "did you check the trademark issues with redhat-web-browser artwork?"
> 
> OK. I vented it with my sponsor and the icon is GPL. No problems there.

The copyright of the artwork is a different issue than the trademark
associated with the same artwork. Anyway the issue is moot now.

> However, I decided it's useless the pack the icon twice.
> I just added redhat-artwork to REQ and pointed the toolbar/menu to the original
> icon(s).

Right (but see my comment about the path no required).

> * Signature:
> 
> Bad habit of mine.
> It helps me locate my own posts in long threads.

You can continue, if you find it useful

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list