[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081





------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr  2007-06-25 17:24 EST -------
E: R-widgetTools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
For this remark I asked spot at that time and he told me that it was not
possible to avoid this complaint with some package.

But maybe there is a trick that I do not know to avoid it... 

None of the documentation files under R/library/widgetTools show up as doc files
in the final package.  I don't know if this is a problem; it depends on whether
the package will still function if those files are deleted.

For this point, R is using a graphical interface on which you can see the
different libraries that are set up for the program (that why there is the %post).

Based on the spec of R-Matrix - R module (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ) I have changed the
%doc section to avoid this redundancy

If you agree on these change then I will change my other spec file.
SPEC : http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec
SRPM :
http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-3.fc6.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.