[Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 22 10:05:59 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-10-22 06:05 EST -------
1) 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully.
   remove redundant dependency on perl >= 2:5.8.0-61 
2) defattr usage should be defattr(-,root,root,-)
3) make test output is
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-basic......ok
        2/12 skipped: Test::Pod not installed on this system
t/01-connect....ok
        7/8 skipped: nothing listening on localhost:443
t/02-live.......# config on linux
# ssl OpenSSL 0.9.8 in /usr
# lib -L/usr/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lgcc
# inc -I/usr/include/openssl
# cc gcc
ok
        1/4 skipped: Cannot load prerequisite modules LWP::UserAgent HTTP::Request
All tests successful, 10 subtests skipped.
==> all test should be successful



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list