[Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 26 05:37:48 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-10-26 01:37 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
5bcb197fd42e67d51c739b1414d514a7  SGMLSpm-1.03ii.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-16.4.fc8  ->
  Provides: perl(SGMLS) perl(SGMLS::Output) perl(SGMLS::Refs)
perl(SGMLS_Attribute) perl(SGMLS_Element) perl(SGMLS_Entity) perl(SGMLS_Event)
perl(SGMLS_Notation)
  Requires: /usr/bin/perl openjade perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp)
perl(Exporter) perl(SGMLS) perl(SGMLS::Output)

APPROVED.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list