[Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180





------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk  2007-09-15 17:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #41)
> Have you seen this list?
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00014.html

yes, and read the responses to it.

it occurs to me to wonder whether the old tetex rpms ought to be subject
to the same treatment.  (a lot of packages have changed since then, and
we try to guide people towards free licences when updates are submitted
to the archive.)

for sure, two of the packages mentioned (fancybox.sty and multicol.sty)
are essentially identical (though i'm with frank mittelbach in thinking
that the complaint about multicol.sty is spurious).

(fwiw, if you remove multicol, you should remove latex, since the latex
team list multicol as a required package.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.