[Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180


kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org  2007-09-15 21:36 EST -------
Well, spot has apparently cleared the multicol license upon rereading, see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00017.html

This leaves:
* Literat license - what's up with that one? Should the affected files just be 
removed?
* AFPL font files: already removed upstream as per:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00030.html
(they're just old versions of the GPLed GhostScript fonts) but need to be 
removed downstream (in the Fedora package) too if there isn't yet any new 
release tarball from upstream without these.
* The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does 
texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both 
already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't actually 
fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with Artistic v1 files in 
them too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.