[Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841





--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com>  2008-12-07 10:38:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)

> You have Patch0: but call %patch instead of %patch0.  rpm these days doesn't
> permit that.

Fixed.

> You can probably drop the BuildRequires conditional for Fedora 8; new branches
> for that release aren't accepted any longer so you only have to consider F-9
> and newer.

Actually, I can't - I plan to submit this package for EPEL as well.

> If I fix the %patch problem, the package builds and rpmlint says:
>   python-sippy.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides sippy
> You should essentially never use an unversioned Provides: like that, because it
> makes it impossible to bring back a package with that name.  See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages
> for more information on how to rename packages.

Fixed.

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-3.20081202cvs.fc10.src.rpm

Koji scratchbuild:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985384

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.