[Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 16:26:41 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: ctags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669
than at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Flag| |needinfo?
------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-02-15 11:26 EST -------
>Comment:
> * fix utf-8 with iconv(1)
fixed
> * Both Summary and description should be reworked, they don't match the
>package as of today.
what is the problem here? could you please give more infos?
>+ guidelines
> * changelog is 10 years old (sic!), could be a be shorter?
the old changelog should be remained
>* disttag is missing
it's fixed
> * source url is wrong, see:
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2
it's fixed
>* I prefer this buildroot:
> %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
i prefer %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> * add %{?_smp_mflags} to make
fixed
> * preserve timestamp on man files (cp -p/install -p)
fixed
> * don't use %makeinstall
fixed
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002
> * don't shiop INSTALL
>the rest seems ok.
fixed
>+ License: ok
>+ American English: ok, however as noted the summary and description is
>outdated
>and should be fixed.
any idea how to fix it?
>Then a issue maybe outside the scope of this review, I really like to see
>etags
>enabled and
>included. Perhaps in a ctags-etags subpackage like this:
>
it doesn't make sense to add redundant etags here.
wont fix
i built new ctags-5.7 in rawhide. could you please check again. Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list