[Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 17 22:06:13 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-02-17 17:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yeah, there was a minor release in 2007 which incorporated two patches, but no
> major development. Before that, last release was 2001. 

That's not necessarily bad, it may also be that dvipdfm is mature.

> I agree that both can co-exist, but what functionality is provided by dvipdfm
> that's not in dvipdfmx? If there's good reason, I'll knock up a dvipdfm package,
> but if there's no technical reason, I'd rather not bother.

I don't know exactly what you mean by technical reason. In any case
dvipdfm is already in texlive, so maybe it is not worth bothering
packaging it separately if it is not updated more often than texlive.
However I think that a dvipdfm package should stay, especially if it
works well and isn't updated often.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list