[Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-02-17 17:22 EST -------
rpmlint says:

dvipdfmx.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9)
dvipdfmx.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/dvipdfmx-20071115/NEWS

It seems to me that version should be 0 and release should be
0.x.20071115. However, dvipdfmx in texlive is already at release 16, so
it seems to me that it can be 
17.x.20071115. Or even x.20071115 with x beginning at 17.

Why the texlive-texmf BuildRequires?

The files
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V
are already owned by texlive-texmf-fonts, which package should own them?

In the texlive spec, there is, for the dvipdfmx subpackage:
# for cmap files
Requires: texlive-texmf-fonts = %{texlive_ver}

I think that it would be better to list explicitly the files
in %_bindir, to avoid surprises.

I suggest adding INSTALL='install -p' to make install.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.