[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 18:07:32 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958





--- Comment #8 from Christopher D. Stover <quantumburnz at hotmail.com>  2008-11-10 13:07:31 EDT ---
Yes!  Getting closer. =)  I'm sorry, I should have caught some of those fixes
you put in the last comment so I hope you don't think I'm trying to torture
you.  I really do appreciate all your help!

[Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-*
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

%{_mandir}/man1/ and %{_datadir}/applications/ are owned by filesystem.  Do I
need to add a Requires for that or just leave it out since I would assume it's
pretty standard to have in every system?

I added the sed commands in there so hopefully the Rpath problem is resolved.

I'm half tempted to merge the gui package and main package with command line
utilities.  Upstream has them separated but I see no reason to separate the
single gui program from everything else.  It just seems like extra work for the
end user to install another package.  What do you think?  Any reason not to do
this?

SRPM:
http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd5SYGYEd0OdOc4HaHOKqTMeFGB1XvaCqgGoTv2lBmjZsvcY6wHZbTJcY5e4eSusYB_Pq0-Gxm333Q/barry-0.14-3.fc10.src.rpm?download

SPEC:
http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd6JBXr2Z-CQqsy3UJmOHAdlbNgSGd2MssbkpTlCm5U7FowYLUs2X0X9W3WEBh8e-EQLyVrWKRQQtQ/barry.spec?download

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list