[Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149





--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-11-20 20:55:12 EDT ---
Can you indicate where you see a statement that this package is under LGPLv3? 
All I see is the COPYING file, which has the usual language indicating that any
LGPL version applies unless there is some indication of a specific choice of
version.  This would indicate LGPLv2+ (since there was no LGPLv1).

In case you don't know and don't like typing, you can write BuildArchitectures:
as just BuildArch:.

Is there any reason to have the "data" directory, instead of just putting the
monomers directly into %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}?  It just seems a bit odd
to have two successive directories with nothing in them except for another
directory.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.