[Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149





--- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn <fenn at stanford.edu>  2008-11-21 19:05:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you indicate where you see a statement that this package is under LGPLv3? 
> All I see is the COPYING file, which has the usual language indicating that any
> LGPL version applies unless there is some indication of a specific choice of
> version.  This would indicate LGPLv2+ (since there was no LGPLv1).
> 

Sorry, I assumed LGPLv3 since it says "version 3" at the top of the copying
file, and appears to be an exact copy of:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.txt

> 
> Is there any reason to have the "data" directory, instead of just putting the
> monomers directly into %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}?  It just seems a bit odd
> to have two successive directories with nothing in them except for another
> directory.

Right - the only reason for that is most programs that access the data assume
the files are under datadir/data/monomers/ - I can simply make a symbolic link
instead, though, if that would be more appropriate.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.