[Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149





--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-11-21 19:31:01 EDT ---
Sure, it says version 3, but it pays to actually read the license.  See section
6:

"
If the Library as you received it does not specify a version number of the GNU
Lesser General Public License, you may choose any version of the GNU Lesser
General Public License ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
"

Our licensing page also covers this:

"
A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that
it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is
technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the
version in whatever COPYING file they include.
"

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

There's no need for a symlink; if other programs expect to see it there then
there's no problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.