[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703





--- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>  2009-04-11 04:18:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> > "it's equivalent to static linking once it was done at build time (as
> > opposed to say, browser plugins)."
> 
> And what if you create "dummy-openssl" 
[... blah blah blah blah...]

Did I say I am a lawyer? What makes you believe the court decisions always have
sane technical basis and this report is here to discuss your licensing worries?

> > "IANAL, and I may be completly wrong and I reserve the right to
> > "parrot" the decision of the lawyers"
> 
> --- and where is the real "unparrotted" analysis?

Would not fedora-legal-list be more suitable for this kind of question?

I'm simply following the licensing guidelines?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

> I tried to install NSS --- it doesn't contain any general openssl functions,
> such as SSL_read, in /usr/include/nss. Am I doing something wrong ... do I need
> some other package? Which?

Have you bothered looking at the BuildRequires? Or at least reading my
comments? You need nss_compat_ossl.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.