[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Apr 11 22:44:00 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703





--- Comment #47 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-04-11 18:43:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> If you bothered to read the above, I'm sure you would understand you are just
> re-stating what was already said.

OK, I may be stupid and you are über-smart, but could you please bow down to my
stupidity and explain me why in the world you haven't removed that
BuildConflicts then, when it is so obvious that it is not needed?

> Thank you for answering the review blocker part. Now that we're clear, could
> you please return the review flag back? I'm not going to reroll the package at
> this point, and am going to remove the BuildConflict upon import.

I will mark this package as correct, when I think it is correct. Really, is
running

rpmdev-bumpspec -v -c '- removing unnecessary BuildConflicts' \
    -u 'Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at ...>' SPECS/links.spec
sed -e '/^BuildConflicts/d' SPECS/links.spec
rpmbuild -ba SPECS/links.spec
<however you call rsync to publish your packages>

too much to ask?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list