[Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418


Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d
                   |                            |e




--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de>  2009-04-13 19:33:22 EDT ---
Simon, you're writing, that upstream splitting is common, gtk, ftp and ssh.
But much more important is: How is the dependency chain? So does nssbackup 
actually work without the gtk subpackage? Does it work without ftp and ssh
subpackages? Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? I
would like to hear your answers. And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge
dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, I would say one package
fits completely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.